SFTP only chroot users with OpenSSH in Debian
From OpenSSH version 4.9 and up it is now possible to create chrooted SFTP-only users with OpenSSH without the need for any add-ons.
In my example i want all users within the “sftp” group to hit /srv/sftponly. This can be done on userlevel or on group level. I will be using groups.
At first, use your favorite editor to ecit /etc/ssh/sshd_config and find the line starting with “Subsystem sftp” (usually at the bottom) – change it so it looks like this:
Subsystem sftp internal-sftp
Next, we need to add the rule to match users. Add this to your sshd_config at the bottom:
Match Group sftp
PasswordAuthentication yes
ChrootDirectory /srv/sftponly
AllowTCPForwarding no
X11Forwarding no
ForceCommand internal-sftp
Now add the sftp group:
groupadd sftp
Add our first user:
useradd -d /srv/sftponly -g sftp -s /bin/false <username>
passwd <username>
Now, restart openssh:
/etc/init.d/ssh restart
And you should be all set. Use your favorite SFTP editor to test. Also try logging on via SSH to make sure that the user does not have access to do that.
Troubleshooting
Along your way some problems might occur. I will try to address the most common ones here. At first what you want to do is enable debugging in openssh so you can see in the logs what happens. Edit /etc/ssh/sshd_server – find “LogLevel” and change the setting to “DEBUG” – and restart ssh. The problems below are shown either in these logs or in the output of the “sftp” command from the client. When using the sftp client be sure to add the “-v” flag for verbose output.
Problem: fatal: bad ownership or modes for chroot directory component “/”
Fix: chmod 755 /
Problem: fatal: bad ownership or modes for chroot directory “/srv/sftponly”
Fix: Folders in the path along the way must be owned by root:root and must not be writable by anyone but root. This is because the directory we are going to use will be the root of the new users. In my example the fix would be: chown root:root /srv ; chown root:root /srv/sftponly ; chmod 755 /srv ; chmod 755 /srv/sftponly”
Problem: Everything seems to be OK.. The users just don’t get access.
Fix: Make sure that you don’t have any whitespaces in your sshd_config after the configuration lines. In my case this caused a real pain.
Hit me a comment if you experience anything strange.
Setting UMASK for SFTP users
Add this line to /etc/pam.d/sshd:
session optional pam_umask.so umask=0002
This particular line will make new files/folders user and group writable.
Do you make backup? – If you do, is your backup strategy safe?
I think server backups here.
As a server administrator, there are a lot of concerns and one of the bigger ones is security. I know a whole lot of server administrators, and when I did a Q&A to know about their backups I was astonished to find out that more than 30% of them did not even take backup. I got a lot of responses and there are many ways of handling your backup, but a lot of them are very very wrong and will not do you any good in case of an emergency.
Do you even back up?
If you do not back up your data, what will you do in case of a hardware failure? Sure, you might be running a RAID, but a RAID is no guarantee, a RAID can break and then you will loose the game.
If you do not take backup, what will you do in the event of a fire breaking loose and destroying everything where ever your server is placed? Is your data valuable to you?
How do you back up?
Making backup is good. But how do you save your backup on the remote host? A few common ways of making backup is via FTP/SFTP/rsync. So, now you’re safe, right? If a fire breaks out, water disaster, disks die and so on, you will have your backup. And that’s good.
If your backup is automated, then your client somehow authorized to the backup server. In most of the above mentioned cased that authentication gives you full access to the backup data! Why is that bad? It is because an attacker that has success gaining access to your server, will be able to emulate the authentication of the automated backup and therefore be able to delete both production data AND backup data.
How much is your backup worth now?
Howto: APC UPS and Debian
So, I have a couple of NAS boxes and a laptop as server running at home. It’s all good until thunder appears. There are multiple risks with this. If the lightning strikes it can cause large surges of electricity that will destroy your equipment, if a power loss occurs it can cause the two RAID5 setups to die and it will cause major data loss.
A couple of days ago I bought a UPS and set it up and now I figured I should also set it up. So I did some reading and this is my result served to make it easier for you.
In this guide, this setup is used:
- Computer with GNU/Linux Debian Lenny
- APC Back-UPS 800
The software I use is apcupsd which is in the Debian repository. Start by installing it:
apt-get update && apt-get install -y apcupsd
The next thing is to configure it. I did a whole lot of reading the manual for apcupsd to make sure I did things right. When your UPS is set up, hook the USB cable into your server.
Go to /etc/apcupsd and edit the file apcupsd.conf
My UPS and most of the newer UPS’es form APC uses USB to interface with the server, and that makes it easier for us to talk to it. These are the parameters I have set:
UPSCABLE usb
Define that we use a USB connection to the UPS.
UPSTYPE usb
DEVICE
ONBATTERYDELAY 5
BATTERYLEVEL 10
MINUTES 10
ISCONFIGURED=yes
/etc/init.d/apcupsd start
# apcaccessAPC : 001,044,1076DATE : Thu Nov 25 10:20:32 CET 2010HOSTNAME : natalieRELEASE : 3.14.4VERSION : 3.14.4 (18 May 2008) debianUPSNAME : natalieCABLE : USB CableMODEL : Back-UPS BR 800UPSMODE : Stand AloneSTARTTIME: Wed Nov 24 20:30:05 CET 2010STATUS : ONLINELINEV : 230.0 VoltsLOADPCT : 13.0 Percent Load CapacityBCHARGE : 100.0 PercentTIMELEFT : 53.0 Minutes
Wed Nov 24 20:22:50 CET 2010 Power failure.Wed Nov 24 20:22:56 CET 2010 Running on UPS batteries.Wed Nov 24 20:23:57 CET 2010 Reached run time limit on batteries.Wed Nov 24 20:23:57 CET 2010 Initiating system shutdown!Wed Nov 24 20:23:57 CET 2010 User logins prohibitedWed Nov 24 20:24:16 CET 2010 apcupsd exiting, signal 15Wed Nov 24 20:24:16 CET 2010 apcupsd shutdown succeeded
Make NAS’es shutdown too!
This is what I did:
2) mkdir /etc/apcupsd/keys
4) chmod 600 /etc/apcupsd/keys/id_rsa
ssh -i /etc/apcupsd/keys/id_rsa -l <username_for_nas> <ip_for_nas> ‘ps’
ssh -i /etc/apcupsd/keys/id_rsa -l admin <ip> ‘/sbin/poweroff’
echo “UPS ${2} initiated Shutdown Sequence” | ${WALL}echo “Will now shutdown NAS systems before killing server” | ${WALL}/usr/bin/ssh -l admin -i /etc/apcupsd/keys/id_rsa <NAS1_IP> ‘/sbin/poweroff’
/usr/bin/ssh -l admin -i /etc/apcupsd/keys/id_rsa <NAS2_IP> ‘/sbin/poweroff’${SHUTDOWN} -h now “UPS ${2} initiated shutdown”
Useriøs hosting!
Som du måske har bemærket (hvis du har læst mine tidligere indlæg..) så er en af mine interesser hosting. Sjovt nok, lever jeg af hosting og ud over at leve af det, så snuser jeg også rundt og ser hvad andre har at byde på.
Jeg møder mange ting rundt omkring, som jeg synes er super fede – men jeg møder også ting, som jeg virkelig synes er til grin. Der er dog én ting, som jeg synes går igen og igen. Udbyderne mangler SSL kryptering på deres kontrolpaneler og deres webmail.
Nogle vil kalde mig sikkerhedsparanoid, men det kan jeg ikke tage mig af. Hvis man først er i gang med at sniffe trafik, så er en af de letteste ting i verden at sniffe trafik der sendes i clear text.
Først, hvis du ikke helt er klar over, hvad jeg ævler om, så se min screencast der omhandler emnet:
Hvis du ikke allerede vidste det, så ved du en lille smule mere om sikkerhed nu. Så langt så godt.
Problemet i det hele er at mange hostingvirksomheder ikke sørger for at SSL kryptere forbindelsen til f.eks. deres kontrolpanel eller deres webmail.
Set med mine øjne, så er dette meget kritisk da man jonglerer rundt med folks private data. Nogle vil så argumentere med at SMTP jo alligevel ikke er krypteret, eller at de fleste kunder alligevel uploader data via en ukrypteret FTP forbindelse.
Det er bare ikke et holdbart argument, for der er ingen grund til at gøre tingene værre end de er. Dernæst, så er risikoen for at data opsnappes på en webmail væsentligt større end den er på f.eks. FTP. Mange mennesker kigger på deres Webmail alle mulige steder men de logger ikke på FTP og uploader ting og sager fra f.eks. en hurtig netcafe i luftnavnen.
Jeg har kigget på lidt forskellige hostingselskaber, og vil derfor her komme med en kort forklaring på hver af dem, om de benytter SSL eller ej. Bemærk! At dette kendetegner hvordan tingene ser ud d. 22/03-2010.
Inforce A/S: Hos Inforce A/S eller Webhotel.net er der ingen kryptering på kontrolpanel og webmail. Deres OWA er der kryptering på.
UnoEuro.com: Hos UnoEuro er der SSL på kontrolpanelet, men som standard på Webmail er der ingen kryptering. Man kan vælge “sikker forbindelse” – men så bruges et self-signed certifikat. Læs lidt om forskellen på self-signed og signed.
Web10: Web10 har ingen SSL kryptering på hverken webmail eller kontrolpanel.
One.com, SurfTown.dk og Gigahost.dk benytter alle 3 SSL kryptering på både webmail og kontrolpanel.

